Please describe how “identity constrains choice” in respect to atrocities committed by individuals (in a group context) in situations of identity-based ethno-national, -religious, or -linguistic conflict. How does this argument of Kreidie & Munroe (K&M) contrast with Stewart & Brown’s explanation of violent conflict? In your opinion, which group of authors’ perspective is more valid: K&M or S&B? Why? Please provide one real-world example to support your answer.
***Your real-world example(s) may NOT include ISIL, Al-Qaeda, Boko-Haram, Taliban or Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990). These specific examples indeed are relevant, but all too familiar and I want you to expand your knowledge by researching/referencing more obscure real-world incidents of violent conflict.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow="slide3"]Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
[meteor_slideshow slideshow="slide2"]Use the order calculator below and get ordering with idealtermpapers.com now! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]